7 Comments
User's avatar
JK's avatar

So no slingshot?

And This Now's avatar

Spot on. A lot of people picture a modern slingshot, but those didn't exist back then. David used a classic military sling. You spin it in a circle and release one cord to fire. In ancient armies, slingers were the equivalent of modern snipers or artillery units. It was a brutally lethal weapon.

JK's avatar

Actually that is the one I was refering to. No sword

Barbara Warrum's avatar

Interesting theory.

I have always presumed it was an Israeli version of the death of the giant Orion. Orion the Hunter is a constellation in the night sky.

In one of the Greek versions, Orion is a giant hunter. He is killed by the god Apollo, using bow and arrows.

Apollo is god of music, prophecy, and light. He is often shown as a beautiful young man with a harp.

There were many versions of constellation Orion, and many stories of who killed him.

In a famous Egyptian version, constellation Orion was the great god Osiris, killed by his brother Set.

In Greek and Roman star stories written by 1st century author Manilius, each of the constellations of the Zodiac is the temple or house of a greater Olympic god. The twelve houses of the Zodiac are the twelve houses of the twelve great gods of the Greco-Roman pantheon.

The house of Apollo is constellation Gemini the Twins. This is right next to constellation Orion the Hunter.

Constellation Orion sinks beneath the Earth as the seasons of the year progress, chased by the house of Apollo. This is why Apollo was said to kill Orion.

Various myths give various killers of Orion, and different reasons for killing him, depending on the local culture.

In later Norse myths, constellation Orion is the giant Ymir.

In ancient myths, constellations and planets were pictured with human form, walking about on Earth and interacting with humans. People often mixed star stories into their foundation myths.

Elyse DeBarre's avatar

Thank you for the article — I found it very interesting. I’m an archaeologist and also qualifying as a physician, so I always appreciate interdisciplinary approaches to ancient narratives.

I wanted to offer a different perspective on Goliath’s height. From both an archaeological and medical standpoint, true pituitary gigantism or acromegaly is extremely rare in any era, and individuals with these conditions usually have significant physical limitations. Late‑stage acromegaly makes coordination difficult, causes joint degeneration, slows movement, and often produces visual problems. Because of these issues, someone with advanced gigantism would struggle to function as a highly effective champion warrior. That’s one reason I think it’s more likely that Goliath was simply a naturally tall man, and that his height was later exaggerated in the storytelling tradition.

Heroic exaggeration is very common in ancient literature, especially when the narrative is meant to elevate a foundational figure. David becomes the heroic king of Israel and the founder of Jerusalem — a bit like Romulus for Rome — so it makes sense that the story amplifies the drama of his early achievements.

Regarding the weapon: it actually was a sling — just not the modern toy slingshot people imagine. Slings absolutely existed in the Bronze and Iron Ages; we have archaeological sling stones from Israel, Philistine cities, Egypt, Assyria, and Greece, and ancient art showing slingers. Ancient slings were serious military weapons, and scholars do treat slings and bows as the ancient equivalents of modern firearms (pistols, rifles, etc.). A fast, dense stone striking the head can absolutely incapacitate or kill, especially if it hits certain vulnerable areas. That part of the narrative is medically and historically plausible.

David’s youth is also not a problem. Historically, he was probably around 15–17. In ancient herding societies, boys learned fighting skills from childhood because they needed them to protect flocks from predators. Israelite society had a strong pastoral component, so it’s reasonable that David would have been highly skilled with a sling long before this encounter. Sling‑use was essential for warding off animals and defending oneself. A family with a substantial flock would also have had some status, which fits with David being chosen for leadership — combat ability was an important part of ancient rulership.

So while the medical theory is interesting, the simpler historical explanation — a tall warrior, a trained youth, and later literary exaggeration — fits well with what we know from archaeology, ancient storytelling, and the realities of pastoral life.

Thanks again for the thought‑provoking piece. I write such articles myself both for my Substack account and for my book publications.

Yvonne Elizabeth  Aston's avatar

So interesting. Thanks for sharing Titan’s hard won secret and Goliath’s possible handicaps.

Tom C's avatar

There is a basic assumption here that both David and Goliath existed.